[Ipv6enabled-tech] Some issues based on the enabled logo meeting in Hiroshima

[Huan Huan]

Hi all,

BII team had modify the IPv6 Enabled web site belong to the consenuse we made in the mailing list. Change log as follows:
1. change the "last access" into "approved date" in the validated list.
2. make the "dynamic logo" into a option for the users. We also set all the approved applications into "not joining dynamic logo" as default, we will send a mail to them to ask them join the "dynamic logo" or not. For the new successful application, they also can choose the option in the web page. If they don't want to use dynamic logo, they can use a static logo.

Cheers,
Huan
2010-01-19 



Huan Huan 
Senior Engineer
IPv6 R&D Center

BII Group
2508,Tower A,Times Fortune Building,
No.6 Shuguangxili, Chaoyang District,
Beijing, China 100028,
Tel:8610 58678188-161,
Mobile:8610 15810532975
Email:hhuan at biigroup.cn



发件人： Huan Huan 
发送时间： 2009-11-17  09:26:16 
收件人： ipv6enabled-admin; ipv6enabled-tech 
抄送： 
主题： Some issues based on the enabled logo meeting in Hiroshima 
Hi all,

Welcome to ipv6enabled mailing list! 

We host the first meeting in Hiroshima to discuss the enabled logo promotion, it was great for the IPv6 enabled logo. Some issues discussed in the meeting should be discussed in the ML now.

#1. make the "dynamic logo" be a option for the users
Suggestion from Yanick, several logo winners had removed "dynamic logo" after they use dynamic logo once to win the logo, so maybe we can set the "dynamic logo" is a option for the users, when the applicant use the dynamic logo once(make sure they should use once to verify their belonging for the application), then they can choose using a static logo or a "dynamic logo" in their web site. Than means, the static logo user will not joining the maintenance testing procedure. It will make some modification for web site describaion, specification and also the system program. 

#2. change the "last access" into "approved date"
Suggestion from Miyata-san, change the "last access" into the "approved date". If we do that, how to deal with the early logo winners? Should we give them a vague time, such as: "July, 2009" or something others?

Appreciate your comments before December 11th!!!!

Cheers,

Huan 

Huan HUAN @ BII IPv6 Center
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ipv6forum.com/pipermail/ipv6enabled-tech/attachments/20100119/bb19feb3/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1662 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ipv6forum.com/pipermail/ipv6enabled-tech/attachments/20100119/bb19feb3/attachment.gif